When I started I couldn't breathe, and I dropped out on the second lap. It was such a bad day for me, I woke up feeling bad, and when I got to the race I was unsure. I have to be proactive, to do what I can, and then know when to back off. I have a good diet - and if my diet's good that affects the breathing. "For racing, I just need to make sure I take my allergy meds and my inhaler. and if I don't, I just do some recovery and do the intervals the next day. Instead of stressing about training, I have an idea of what I have to do, and if I get on the bike and feel good, I do them. Some days I have to get on the bike and ride a bit before I know. Sometimes I wake up and I feel good or I don't, and I know. "I'm learning how to manage it, checking in with my body every day and seeing what I can do. But she still has days where training and racing are impossible. Compton's asthma has taken a lot of experimentation to get it under control. Chris Froome: I haven't broken any rulesįroome has thrived in races where quitting because you can't breathe is not an option - regularly winning or placing on the podium of Grand Tours.A lot of explaining to do: The questions raised by the Chris Froome salbutamol case.Froome returns adverse analytical finding for salbutamol.It's a tough call and I know the WADA rules need to be followed but my gut tells me there's something more going on." "I could be completely wrong, seeing that we all metabolize things we ingest differently, maybe it's just the way his body breaks it down," Compton allowed, "but I feel there is more to the story than that. "And with all the past issues with the Sky team pushing the 'gray area' with TUEs, I feel it's a bit suspicious."Ĭompton allowed that Team Sky principal David Brailsford could be correct in his confidence that Froome's values were the result of a unique physiology. "I just don't know about Froome's explanation about the high amount simply being from using his inhaler a normal amount," Compton said. The questions around Froome are exacerbated by Team Sky's own 'marginal gains' philosophy and the recent lengthy inquiry into their use of Therapeutic Use Exemptions for injected corticosteroids with Bradley Wiggins - a legal, but potentially performance-enhancing practice. Researchers are now investigating whether asthma attacks themselves cause a ‘refractory period’ that enhances lung and heart efficiency during competition as a way to explain the paradox.īut the suspicion that athletes are abusing salbutamol continues, fuelled perhaps by the fact that healthy Norwegian skiers have been accused of using inhalers with the idea it would boost performance. But numerous studies have debunked the idea that therapeutic doses are peformance-enhancing, and WADA now allows the use of IBAs without a TUE within the allowed limits. Until 2010, WADA had strict TUE requirements for salbutamol to prevent its use for performance enhancement. Researchers over the past decades have found a strange paradox in elite athletics - asthmatic athletes were performing better than their non-asthmatic peers.Īt the 2012 Olympic Games in London, 700 of the 10,000 athletes were asthmatic – a percentage in line with the general population – but they were twice as likely to win medals than non-asthmatic athletes. "It doesn't make sense that you could have that much in your system and still be able to pedal that hard. It helps you breathe better, but granted, if I went hard again, I'd have another attack. The rescue inhaler is exactly that - it's there for a few puffs to get you back to normal. I can barely pedal, let alone keep pushing hard. "As someone who has exercise-induced asthma and allergies - if I have an asthma attack, I can't finish the race. But Froome insists that he used his inhaler as normal, and it resulted in a urine value that was twice the WADA limit - a sequence Compton challenges from her own experience.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |